Circular Economy Enablers
Battery recycling, especially in the EV sector, is proving to be not only environmentally beneficial but also economically viable. Companies like Redwood Materials, founded by Tesla’s former CTO J.B. Straubel, are leading the way in demonstrating its financial feasibility. Redwood has developed processes that enable them to recycle 95% of battery minerals, which substantially reduces the reliance on new material mining. This is crucial as it cuts down the economic costs associated with raw material extraction and processing. The company’s approach has proven to significantly lower CO2 emissions by 40-70% compared to traditional recycling. By recycling batteries on a large scale, it has set a precedent for reducing the U.S.’s dependency on international battery supply chains dominated by China. With the company’s capacity to support the production of a quarter-million EVs annually and plans to expand this capacity, they exemplify how recycling practice can support growing market demand for EVs in an economical way. Another standout example is Umicore which have demonstrated the economic and environmental potential of battery recycling. Umicore’s advanced materials technology, for example, plays a crucial role in recycling precious metals from used cathodes, helping to reduce the demand for virgin materials. These companies exemplify the potential to unlock substantial economic value from resources in use.1
Environmental Impact
Could fossil fuel subsidies fight the energy transition? In 2022, fossil fuel subsidies reached $7 trillion worldwide– a staggering sum that has risen from $5 trillion in 2020 due to government support amid surging energy prices. New research shows that eliminating these subsidies could cut global CO2 emissions by 43% below expected levels by 2030, aligning with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Furthermore, reforming subsidies could yield $4.4 trillion, or 3.6% of global GDP, by 2030. Despite the political challenges, implementing a plan with defined goals, engaging stakeholders, introducing gradual price increases, providing targeted aid to low-income families and maintaining neutral energy pricing can enable countries to effectively reallocate these resources. The money saved from ending fossil fuel subsidies is likely to be more than enough for the energy transition. Estimates for the annual investment needed by 2030 range from $4 trillion (IEA) to $9 trillion (Climate Policy Institute), but we think the actual figure could be lower due to rapidly falling prices and learning rates. Progress is ongoing, but governments must ensure that their industrial policy pledges do not merely serve as rhetorical smokescreens for protectionism. Global cooperation and coordination are essential to address climate change, not geopolitical finger-pointing.2,3,4