Can American Environmentalism Thrive Under Trump 2.0?

With Donald Trump’s return to the political stage, American environmentalism faces a critical test. From potential deregulation to shifting energy policies, a Trump administration would present unique challenges, but this moment also offers a valuable opportunity for reflection and adaptation. Here are three shifts that environmental advocates should consider to ensure durability and relevance in the years ahead.

1. Shift from Resistance to Realistic Engagement

Environmentalism has long adopted a stance of uncompromising resistance, particularly in response to Trump-era policies. But focusing exclusively on resistance has its limits, often casting environmentalism as inflexible and reactive. For the movement to achieve lasting gains, it may be time to move beyond all-or-nothing opposition.

By engaging with Trump’s policies constructively where possible, environmental advocates can achieve incremental gains rather than playing a constant game of defense. Recognising that Trump represents a substantial segment of American opinion allows environmentalism to focus on the issues rather than on purely ideological opposition. This shift from maximalist resistance to targeted engagement could allow environmentalists to preserve gains even in less favorable political climates.

2. Recognise Broader American Concerns and Engage Beyond Echo Chambers

American environmentalism often reflects the concerns of urban, educated and progressive groups. But this subset of the population has different priorities from Trump’s coalition, which includes a wide range of voters who may not resonate with abstract environmental ideals. For environmentalism to maintain its relevance, it must move beyond its core base and connect with the concerns of middle America.

This involves reframing the message to address tangible benefits that resonate with a wider audience. Environmentalists should emphasise how sustainability creates jobs, supports local communities and enhances energy independence. Policies like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) have made strides in transitioning the energy sector. Rather than retreating in the face of political opposition, environmental advocates can highlight how elements of the IRA support economic growth and energy independence, values that resonate across diverse demographics. By aligning with broader American concerns, environmentalism can expand its base and build support that endures through political changes.

3. Adapt Strategically in a Shifting Political Landscape

Perhaps the biggest challenge for environmentalism in the Trump era is to embrace a more adaptive approach. Political realism means acknowledging that not all policy shifts under Trump will be reversed in the future and that durability requires a pragmatic response. Engaging with areas of potential alignment, like certain regulatory reforms, could allow environmentalists to advance sustainable goals even within a less favorable administration.

For example, issues like permitting reform for clean energy projects or improvements in nuclear energy regulations offer potential common ground. Advocating for policies that strengthen these sectors without compromising core environmental goals can help maintain progress in unpredictable political climates. Strategic adaptation and a willingness to engage with Trump’s agenda where it overlaps with sustainability will reinforce environmentalism’s resilience.

In the end, the task for American environmentalism amidst Trump 2.0 is to secure its objectives through flexibility, engagement and a practical approach to today’s political realities. By focusing on realistic engagement, broadening its appeal and adapting to shifts in the political landscape, environmentalism can remain a durable and relevant force in American life, safeguarding both its ideals and its impact.